MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411048254 · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01566-3

Sodium’s elusive tI50 phase predicted to be a body-centered tetragonal electride

2025· article· en· W4411048254 on OpenAlexafffund
Akinwumi Akinpelu, Mangladeep Bhullar, Hui Wang, Yansun Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemPhase (matter)Materials scienceCrystallographyChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium exhibits an anomalous melting curve with a minimum at high pressure, where several complex crystalline phases coinciding with this minimum have been observed but remain unresolved. Solving these structures would help better understand sodium’s unusual melting behavior. In this study, we determine the crystal structure of one such phase, the tI50 phase. Using a data-derived potential-assisted structure search, we identify the tI50 phase as a body-centered tetragonal structure with 50 atoms per unit cell, crystallizing in the I4/m space group. The predicted lattice parameters deviate by less than 0.38% from experimental values, and enthalpy calculation confirms this structure as the ground state for sodium across a ~20 GPa pressure range. The structure features a cage-like polyhedral network with interstitial electride states and remains weakly metallic, unlike the insulating hP4 phase. Resolving this unique structure advances understanding of sodium’s diverse structural behavior under high pressure. Sodium exhibits an anomalous melting curve with a minimum at high pressure, but the crystalline phases coinciding with this minimum remain unresolved. Here, using a data-derived potential-assisted structure search, the authors predict the crystal structure of one of those phases, tI50, and show that it exhibits weak metallic character.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications ChemistrySame topicAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen ReductionFrench-language works237,207