Ecology, morphology and distribution of Anisota finlaysoni Riotte (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying the conservation needs of the short-horned oakworm, Anisota finlaysoni Riotte, has been hampered by incomplete resolution of species boundaries and geographic ranges of the Anisota senatoria species-group. Here, the life history, morphology, occurrence, and DNA barcode variation of A. finlaysoni and A. senatoria are compared across a transect of three key geographic regions in Ontario, Canada. Contrary to recent range depictions, our results show that A. finlaysoni is currently confirmed to occur only in the region of eastern Lake Ontarios north shore. Previous information on morphological characters used to distinguish A. finlaysoni is incomplete or erroneous. Lake Erie populations most recently assigned to A. finlaysoni exhibit some finlaysoni-like larval traits, but adult phenotype of all examined material is indistinguishable from A. senatoria of the Lake Huron region, and unlike topotypical A. finlaysoni. Although the cryptic occurrence of A. finlaysoni in the Lake Erie region cannot be ruled out, current data indicate that this species has a much smaller global range than previously believed, and is separated by a geographic gap of about 200 km from the nearest A. senatoria populations. Re-assignment of the Lake Erie populations from A. finlaysoni to A. senatoria, and the recognition of some peripheral occurrence records as historical errors, results in a significantly smaller global range for A. finlaysoni. DNA barcode data for the genus Anisota are at odds with current taxonomy, limiting the utility of barcodes in discriminating species of the senatoria-group. Because A. finlaysoni is distinct morphologically as adults and larvae from geographically nearby populations of A. senatoria, it should continue to be treated as a distinct species pending convincing evidence to the contrary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".