MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411059971 · doi:10.62675/2965-2774.20250118

Target trial emulation on dexmedetomidine for critically ill patients: all that glitters is not gold

2025· editorial· en· W4411059971 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna Brandão Barreto, Lisa Burry, Dimitri Gusmao-Flores

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Science · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemOntario Drug Policy Research Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexmedetomidineCritically illEmulationMedicineIntensive care medicineAnesthesiaPsychologySedation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alpha-2 agonists have been used as anesthetic adjuncts for a very long time. Initially, drugs such as xylazine and detomidine were almost solely used for veterinary practice. Subsequent studies demonstrated the effectiveness of deep anesthesia in animals employing the newer, more potent, and selective alpha-2-agonists, such as the stereoisomer of medetomidine, dexmedetomidine (D-isomer). In the […]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.453
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.453
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care ScienceSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207