MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411060001 · doi:10.1186/s13049-025-01420-4

Spinal cord injury in severely injured patients: results from the Swiss Trauma Registry

2025· article· en· W4411060001 on OpenAlexaff
Nader Hejrati, Felix C. Stengel, Michael G. Fehlings, Christian Maschmann, Martin N. Stienen, Kai Oliver Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpinal cord injurySpinal traumaEmergency medicineInjury Severity ScoreSpinal cordAnesthesiaSurgeryPoison controlInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) in the context of severe trauma are rare, and patient demographics are infrequently reported. This study aimed to assess patient demographics in acute traumatic SCI in the context of severe injuries in Switzerland and to evaluate differences in demographics and outcomes stratified by timing of surgery. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Swiss Trauma Registry (STR) from 2015 to 2024. The STR includes patients with major trauma (injury severity score [ISS] ≥ 16 and/or abbreviated injury scale [AIS] head ≥ 3) admitted to any level-one trauma centre in Switzerland. We evaluated patient characteristics, complications, and hospital outcomes, which were further stratified by early (< 24 h) and late (≥ 24 h) surgery. RESULTS: Among 24,328 patients, 6,819 (28%) sustained spinal injuries, and 383 (1.6%) had a concurrent SCI with an incidence of 0.44 cases per 100’000 inhabitants. The median age was 52 years (IQR 31–70) and 73.6% were male. The primary causes were falls (63.1%) and road traffic accidents (29.6%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.7%. Late surgery patients more often had concomitant moderate or severe traumatic brain injuries (31% vs. 14%, p = 0.009) and were more likely to have no fractures or dislocations of the spine (22.8% versus 6.8%, p = 0.001). Patients who underwent early surgery had shorter hospital stays (9d [5-16], versus 16 d [9-24]; F = 13.92, p < 0.001). Late surgery was associated with a higher likelihood of developing two and more complications (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.18–5.63, p = 0.018), including urinary tract infections (OR 12.13, 95% CI 2.76–53.41, p = 0.001) and multiple organ failure (OR 12.99, 95% CI 1.64-102.83, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers insights into the characteristics and outcomes of acute SCI care in severely injured patients. Despite its low incidence, the acute management of this patient population remains highly challenging. Our findings suggest early stabilization of spinal injuries in severely injured patients may reduce hospital stays and complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency MedicineSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207