MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning-driven Blind Spot Detection for Forklifts in Industrial Environments

2025· article· en· W4411064948 on OpenAlexaff
Choosak Pornsing, Thanathorn Karot, Arnat Watanasungsuit, Teerapat Inta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlind spotArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDeep learningProcess engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In modern industrial settings, ensuring the safety of human workers coexisting with heavy machinery like forklifts is paramount. Traditional safety measures often fall short in addressing dynamic hazards, especially in blind spot areas where visibility is limited. This research introduces an advanced blind spot detection system utilizing deep learning techniques specifically designed for industrial environments. The system leverages the YOLOv8 architecture, enhanced through transfer learning, and optimized with model pruning and quantization techniques to achieve high accuracy and low latency, operating at 45 FPS on edge devices with a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 97.3%. The detection models are integrated with a real-time video processing pipeline using the RTSP protocol and OpenCV for spatial awareness. The system incorporates a novel attention mechanism to improve detection accuracy in challenging conditions, such as occlusions and varying lighting. Real-time alerts are provided via an integrated hardware system using ESP8266 microcontrollers and Node-RED for orchestration, ensuring immediate hazard notifications to operators. Extensive experiments in an automotive wheel manufacturing facility validate the system’s effectiveness, demonstrating an improvement of up to 5% in mAP compared to traditional methods. This work contributes to a scalable, efficient, and highly accurate solution for enhancing safety in high-risk industrial environments by addressing critical blind spot hazards in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207