The Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health and Healthcare in Youth with Chronic Physical Illness and Their Families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted youth with chronic physical illness (CPI) and their caregivers. Emerging research aimed at understanding the impacts of the pandemic on this population is predominantly quantitative, lacking qualitative insights. This study used a qualitative approach to examine the experiences of COVID-19 among youth with CPI and their families, exploring how the pandemic impacted their mental health and use of mental health services. Using a constructivist paradigm and a phenomenological approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with youth with CPI (n = 8) and their primary caregiver (n = 13) between March 2021 and May 2021. Thematic analysis was used to identify three key themes: (1) mental health impact on youth, (2) caregiver mental health declines, and (3) variability in the experiences of mental healthcare. The findings highlight the heightened depression, anxiety, and stress among youth with CPI and their caregivers, exacerbated by loneliness, uncertainty, and social restrictions, while also revealing that virtual mental healthcare was perceived as less effective than in-person care, which was valued for its human connection, privacy, and comfort. These results emphasize the need for improved, comprehensive mental healthcare and the adoption of family-centred care models to strengthen caregiver–youth relationships and better integrate physical and mental healthcare to improve health outcomes for this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".