Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood. A paradoxical representation of life and death. This paper examines Indigenous epistomologies of menstruation as complex weavings of ceremony, maternal indicators, corporeal sovereignty, power, gender relations and reimaginings of “womanhood,” femininity, and mothering. Through the analysis of the character Tarsa’DeShae in Daniel Heath Justice’s (Cherokee) trilogy, Kinship and personal embodied experiences, this paper explores the historical and contemporary Indigenous understandings of moontime. Moontime teachings and ceremonies are critical elements continue the vital discourse on finding solution to address the oppression of, and end to the genocide against, Indigenous women, girls, and genderful1 people. Le sang. Une représentation paradoxale de la vie et de la mort. Cet article examine les épistomologies autochtones de la menstruation en tant que tissage complexe de cérémonies, d'indicateurs maternels, de souveraineté corporelle, de pouvoir, de relations entre les sexes et de réimaginations de la « féminité », de la féminité et du maternage. À travers l'analyse du personnage de Tarsa'DeShae dans la trilogie de Daniel Heath Justice (Cherokee), Kinship, et des expériences incarnées personnelles, cet article explore les compréhensions autochtones historiques et contemporaines du moontime. Les enseignements et les cérémonies du moontime sont des éléments essentiels qui poursuivent le discours vital sur la recherche de solutions pour lutter contre l'oppression des femmes, des filles et des personnes sexuées autochtones et mettre fin au génocide dont elles sont victimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".