MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411081265 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ade221

Assessing radiosensitivity through sublethal damage recovery: a comparison of survival-based and molecular repair kinetics

2025· article· en· W4411081265 on OpenAlexafffund
Naim Chabaytah, Mirta Dumančić, Emmanuel Asante, Tanner Connell, Michael Witcher, Shirin A. Enger

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsCollège de MaisonneuveJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersInstitut TransMedTechMEDTEQ+AlphaTau MedicalMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsRadiosensitivityClonogenic assayRadioresistanceHeLaCell survivalSurvival analysisChemistryAndrologyCancer researchCell cultureMolecular biologyRadiation therapyBiologyCellMedicineGeneticsInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective . This study aimed to determine whether the kinetics of sublethal damage recovery after x-ray irradiation, quantified as the repair half time ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>repair</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>SLD</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) derived from split-dose clonogenic survival, correlates with intrinsic radiosensitivity across four human cancer cell lines: HeLa (cervical), PC3 (prostate), and HCT116 and HT29 (colorectal). In addition, the study compared this survival-based indicator with molecular repair kinetics assessed through γ H2AX and 53BP1 foci clearance. Approach . By using a phenomenological approach, we assessed sublethal damage recovery kinetics, aiming to determine whether this recovery rate could serve as a biomarker for cancer-specific intrinsic radiosensitivity. Cells were subjected to split-dose 4 Gy irradiation delivered in two fractions of 2 Gy across a 0 to 10 h inter-fraction interval range using a Multi-Rad x-ray irradiator with a peak tube voltage of 225 kV. The clonogenic assay was performed following split-dose irradiation of the experimental groups to assess cell survival. Colonies were fixed, stained, and counted ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>⩾</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 50 cells/colony viable threshold) to calculate survival fractions (SFs) from the four independent experimental runs completed for each cell line. Unirradiated control cells were used to calculate plating efficiency. The measured SF as a function of inter-fraction time was fitted with the Lea–Catcheside modified linear-quadratic model with a half-life of sublethal damage repair, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>repair</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>SLD</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , as a free parameter. To compare this approach to molecular DNA repair kinetics, immunofluorescence-based ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF) clearance experiments were performed following single 2 Gy irradiation using the same x-ray source. γ H2AX and 53BP1 foci were quantified from 0.5 to 24 h post-irradiation, and foci clearance half-lives ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>repair</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>AX</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>repair</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>53</mml:mn> <mml:mi>BP</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) were determined by single-phase exponential decay fitting. Main results . For all measured cell lines, an increase in SF was observed with increasing inter-fraction time. The estimated <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>repair</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>SLD</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> varied across cell lines, from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.07</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.35</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> h in HT29, to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.98</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.94</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> h in HeLa, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2.00</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.30</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> h in PC3, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3.58</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.45</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> h in HCT116, indicating different capacities for sublethal damage repair. A negative correlation was measured between <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>repair</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>SLD</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and clonogenic survival at 2 Gy ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Ma

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207