A microstructural signature of the coesite-quartz transformation: New insights from high-pressure experiments and EBSD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultra-high pressure (UHP) metamorphism is difficult to identify in continental crust as few petrological barometers are suitable for dominantly felsic lithologies. In such cases, burial to extreme depths is commonly identified through the preservation of coesite, a high-pressure polymorph of SiO2 that typically forms at depths exceeding ~100 km (i.e., greater than 2 GPa pressure). Unfortunately, coesite readily transforms to quartz upon exhumation, meaning that UHP terranes may often be overlooked. While studies have proposed that the previous presence of coesite could be identified through an orientation signature inherited by quartz, there is no current consensus over whether the coesite-quartz transformation produces any such signatures at all. Here, we combine electron backscatter diffraction analysis of natural and experimental samples to explore microstructural evolution across the coesite-quartz phase transformation. We demonstrate that neighbouring domains of quartz commonly feature an 84 ± 4° rotation of [c]-axes around the pole of a common {m} plane. This orientation relationship is a product of epitaxy, whereby the {11-22} Japan twin plane in quartz nucleates on the (010) plane in coesite. In supercell simulations, the nucleation of Japan twins can be explained by the energetically favourable alignment of quartz tetrahedra on parental coesite tetrahedra. Through experiments, we demonstrate that this signature emerges over a broad range of conditions, regardless of the availability of nucleation sites (e.g., grain boundaries) or the density of crystal lattice defects (e.g., dislocations). Overall, our work provides a quantitative and unambiguous tool for identifying UHP terranes from quartz in isolation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".