MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411090872 · doi:10.3390/toxics13060482

Absence of Adverse Effects on Pulmonary Histopathology and Functions Following Inhalation Exposure to Chloromethylisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone

2025· article· en· W4411090872 on OpenAlex
Sam Kacew, Eşref Demir

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueToxics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInhalationMedicineInhalation exposureRespiratory tractNasal administrationLungHistopathologyAdverse effectPulmonary fibrosisPharmacologyRespiratory systemAnesthesiaPhysiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In South Korea, issues have been raised regarding exposure to humidifier disinfectant products containing certain chemicals postulated to induce lung diseases in consumers. Several rodent studies utilizing whole-body inhalation, which comprises freely moving animals breathing through the nares, and intranasal instillation involving restraint, were conducted by various Korean Governmental Agencies on these products to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between these products and the development of lung diseases. In particular, the humidifier disinfectant product Kathon, containing chloromethylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone (CMIT and MIT), when directly introduced into inhalation chambers at varying concentrations for up to 13 weeks, produced no significant histopathological alterations and no marked changes in pulmonary function parameters. Further, there was no evidence of cytotoxicity; total and differential cell counts did not differ from control. In addition, the levels of cytokine markers of inflammation were not markedly altered. In contrast to published papers utilizing intratracheal and intranasal instillation, where the animal is anesthetized and chemical bypasses the defense mechanisms in the respiratory tract, then reaches the pulmonary region, ignoring recommended dose levels was found to initiate fibrotic responses in mice and rats. However, the usefulness of experimental results to extrapolate to humans obtained following intratracheal and intranasal instillation studies is of limited value because the data generated did not use a realistic design and appropriate dosimetry. Therefore, these findings have significant drawbacks in their use to characterize an inhalation risk for pulmonary fibrosis in humans and cannot be used for the extrapolation of such risk to humans. It is thus evident that the inhalation data generated by the Korean Regulatory Agencies are more realistic and show that exposure to CMIT and MIT does not initiate pulmonary fibrosis. Although inhalation studies still do not fully replicate real-world human exposure scenarios and have limitations for direct extrapolation to humans, they are nevertheless more appropriate than intratracheal or intranasal instillation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it