Growth Performance of Carps Cultured Under Different Experimental Conditions at Akividu, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to assess the influence of different fertilizers, supplementary feed and probiotics on growth performance of major carps Catla (Catla catla), Rohu (Labeo rohita), Mrigala (Cirrhinus mrigala) and Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) cultured under different treatments for a period of one year from August, 2014 to July 2015 at Akividu, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Four experimental ponds i.e. Control (C), Treatment-1 (T1), Treatment-2 (T2) and Treatment-3 (T3) were selected for this study. Among the four treatments, maximum average body weight of carps was recorded in T3. Among the four fish species, Catla showed the maximum average body weight (1313.4g) in treatment pond-3. The highest specific growth rate was observed in treatment-3. Overall the highest survival rate of four carps recorded in T3. The FCR varied from 1:2.70 to 1:3.28 in T2 and T3. The gross yield recorded as 3485.97, 4456.44, 6133.56 and 7311.98 kg/ha in Control, T1, T2 and T3 respectively. The physical and chemical characteristics of pond water remained within the favorable limits during culture. The lowest biomass of plankton (51.4 to 96.8mg/l) recorded in C, while the maximum plankton biomass (96.4 to 145.8 mg/l) recorded in T3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".