MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411101388 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092114

Trends and indicators of nursing workforce shortages in Canada: a retrospective ecological study, 2015–2022

2025· article· en· W4411101388 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guosong Wu, Natalie Sapiro, Riley Martens, Megan Harmon, Tracie Risling, Cathy A. Eastwood

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvertimeWorkforceMedicinePopulationNursing shortageNursingHealth careEconomic shortagePopulation healthDemographyFamily medicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthNurse educationEconomic growthLabour economicsGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To examine longitudinal trends and identify key indicators of nursing workforce shortages across Canadian provinces and territories using publicly available data. DESIGN: Retrospective ecological study. SETTING: Primary and secondary care in Canada. National data were extracted from Statistics Canada and the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) between 2015 and 2022 at the provincial and territorial levels. PARTICIPANTS: The study included registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses employed in the Canadian healthcare system. Licensed practical nurses and nurse practitioners were excluded. Territories with missing data were excluded from the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was nursing workforce shortage, assessed in relation to potential indicators, including the nurse-to-population ratio, job vacancy rate and annual costs of overtime work, using structural equation modelling (SEM). RESULTS: The Canadian nursing workforce grew by 8.0%, with the nurse-to-population ratio increasing from 11.08 to 12.13 per 1000 population. Job vacancies rose by 6.4% (95% CI: 6.29 to 6.51%), overtime hours increased by 13.09 million (95% CI: 10.28 to 15.87) and yearly overtime costs rose by 0.78 billion CAD (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.92). SEM revealed significant associations between workforce shortage and the nurse-to-population ratio (standardised β=0.863, 95% CI: 0.942 to 0.975), job vacancy rate (β=0.958, 95% CI: 0.927 to 0.990) and yearly overtime costs (β=0.983, 95% CI: 0.967 to 0.999). Predicted shortage scores were lower before 2020 but increased significantly after 2020, potentially reflecting the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growth in the nursing workforce, increasing job vacancies, overtime hours and costs highlight persistent shortages. Monitoring these indicators is essential for effective workforce planning and sustainable healthcare delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207