Colour discrimination deficit in REM sleep behavior disorder: an analysis of dopaminergic depletion, cognition, and brain morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is associated with impaired colour discrimination, cognitive deficits and morphological changes. This study evaluates whether colour discrimination deficits in iRBD are mediated by cognitive functions or related to dopaminergic denervation and brain morphology. A sample of 73 patients with iRBD and 77 controls underwent neuropsychological assessment, and colour discrimination assessment using the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test, DAT-SPECT, and MRI. The data were analyzed using multiple regression, mediation analysis, and voxel-based morphometry. Significant between-group differences were found in total colour discrimination as well as in the red-yellow spectrum. The association between iRBD and performance in the yellow-green spectrum was mediated by cognitive functions, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. In controls, a positive correlation between the yellow-green spectrum and the left inferior frontal gyrus was observed compared to patients, however, this association was largely driven by a single data point. The performance in the green-blue spectrum was associated with the activity of dopamine transporters in the caudate nucleus. No interactions were found for total colour discrimination in any analysis. The present findings demonstrate a colour vision deficit in iRBD, which is not directly linked to any of the proposed potential explanatory mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".