MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411103641 · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101472

Consistent improvements in liver histology across subgroups in a post hoc analysis of the SYNERGY-NASH trial with tirzepatide

2025· article· en· W4411103641 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mark L. Hartman, Rohit Loomba, Eric Lawitz, Raj Vuppalanchi, Jérôme Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Masato Yoneda, Yuanyuan Tang, Bram Brouwers, Mathijs C. Bunck, Axel Haupt, Arun J. Sanyal

Bibliographic record

VenueJHEP Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGenentechNovartis PharmaBausch HealthNovo NordiskIntercept PharmaceuticalsJazz PharmaceuticalsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsGilead FoundationAlnylam PharmaceuticalsJanssen PharmaceuticalsGilead SciencesMedpaceArrowhead PharmaceuticalsGlaxoSmithKlineAmgenNGM BiopharmaceuticalsPfizerAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsPost-hoc analysisPost hocHistologyMedicineComputer scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims In the SYNERGY-NASH trial in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, tirzepatide, an agonist of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors, effectively resolved MASH without worsening fibrosis in up to 73% of patients. We explored the extent of histological improvements across clinically relevant subgroups in this trial. Methods Participants (n=190) were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to receive once-weekly s.c. tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. We analyzed 155 participants who completed the study on treatment with evaluable end-of-treatment biopsies. Post-hoc subgroups (n=34) were defined by demographics, histology, serum, and imaging biomarkers using the median of baseline values for continuous variables. Risk differences (RDs) versus placebo (95% CI) were calculated using a logistic regression model. Results Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was consistently associated with improved MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis across subgroups of sex, age, ethnicity, body mass index, type 2 diabetes status, histological disease activity, fibrosis stage, serum aminotransferases, serum biomarkers of fibrosis and MASH, and imaging assessments of liver fat, fibroinflammation, and stiffness. For tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg, the RDs were significant (p<0.05 or lower) for 74%, 97%, and 100% of the subgroups, respectively. While most RDs for fibrosis improvement without worsening of MASH favored tirzepatide, these were not statistically significant in 59-79% of the subgroups due to limited sample size. Significant (p<0.05) fibrosis improvement was observed with tirzepatide 5 and 15 mg among participants with stage 3 fibrosis. Conclusion These post-hoc analyses suggest that tirzepatide was consistently associated with improved MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis across subgroups defined by demographics, histology, and biomarkers, as compared with placebo. SYNERGY-NASH ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04166773

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJHEP ReportsSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207