MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411117264 · doi:10.1029/2024jd042847

Autonomous Year‐Round Measurements of O <sub>3</sub> , CO, CH <sub>4</sub> , and N <sub>2</sub> O in the High Arctic With the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer

2025· article· en· W4411117264 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joseph Hung, Lei Liu, Mathias Palm, Zen Mariani, G. L. Manney, Luis Millán, Kimberly Strong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftJet Propulsion LaboratoryEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaNova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
KeywordsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite its status as a proverbial canary in the coal mine for global climate change, the Arctic has limited observational data, particularly during polar night. Longwave atmospheric emission has been recorded since 2006 at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory, located at Eureka, Nunavut, Canada (80N). Profiles and total columns of ozone (), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (), and nitrous oxide () were retrieved from these measurements from 2008 to 2022, and the contribution of the water vapour continuum to the radiative transfer improved the spectral fitting. The mean relative difference between the Extended‐range Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (E‐AERI) and those from co‐located instruments (Bruker 125HR, Triax‐180 UV‐VIS spectrometers, and ozonesondes) were reasonable: after smoothing with the E‐AERI averaging kernel, these differences are +15.8% for , −0.1% for , +7.1% for , and +0.8% for compared to the 125HR, and are +17.8% and +24.2% for compared to the GBSs and ozonesondes, respectively. Significant depletion and enhancement events as a result of polar vortex dynamics/chemistry and wildfires respectively were also observed in the E‐AERI time series, along with the diurnal cycle. Finally, trends of +0.31 0.17% , −0.75 0.14% , +0.94 0.09% , and +0.38 0.05% from 2011 to 2022 were found for , , , and total columns, respectively, generally consistent with previously reported global and regional trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→