MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411126784 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf113

Intermittent premature ejaculation: exploring an understudied phenomenon

2025· article· en· W4411126784 on OpenAlex
David L. Rowland, Stanley E. Althof, Philippe Côté-Léger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsAssumption University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremature ejaculationPhenomenonEjaculationPsychologyMedicinePsychoanalysisInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although the lifelong and acquired subtypes of premature ejaculation (PE) have long been acknowledged, other putative PE subtypes have garnered less consideration. AIM: This study aimed to describe a potentially unrecognized form of PE characterized by episodic or intermittent symptomology rather than regular, consistent symptomology. METHODS: From an online sample of 409 men with PE, 31 identified as specifically having intermittent PE (IPE) rather than either lifelong PE (LPE) or acquired PE (APE). Data regarding PE symptomology-including lack of ejaculatory control, foreplay time and estimated ejaculation latencies (ELs) during PE episodes, foreplay time and estimated ELs during non-PE episodes, and other sexual characteristics-were collected to better describe and understand this group of men. OUTCOMES: Determination of sexual and ejaculatory response characteristics of men with IPE. RESULTS: Men with IPE exhibited PE-typical responses during 40%-90% of their partnered sex episodes (mean ≈ 70%). Depending on the type of partnered sex, mean EL responses during PE episodes ranged from anteportal ejaculation to ~2 minutes, whereas mean EL responses during non-PE episodes ranged from ~3 to 6.5 minutes (P < .001). EL comparisons were also made across types of partnered sex and masturbation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Some men exhibit PE-like symptoms, but do so only episodically or intermittently, a pattern that would technically prevent them from receiving treatment for PE according to most professional PE definitions. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study is the first to detail the sexual and EL characteristics of men who experience PE intermittently. The limitations include issues regarding generalizability due to the relatively small sample size and the inherent bias possible in online studies about sexuality. CONCLUSION: Men with IPE show all the characteristics of men with LPE and APE, except in the consistency with which their symptoms are manifested. Such men would qualify for treatment under ICD-11 guidelines but not under other professionally based diagnostic criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it