MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411131102 · doi:10.5430/wje.v15n2p56

The Impact of Traditional Dance Teaching on the Performance Development of Primary School Learners in Luoyang, China

2025· article· en· W4411131102 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yi Zhao, Saifon Songsiengchai

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceChinaMathematics educationDance educationPsychologyPedagogyTeaching methodVisual artsGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to 1) evaluate the cognitive development of primary school learners participating in dance classes compared to those without exposure to dance education,2) To assess the physical development, including motor skills, coordination, and physical fitness, of primary school learners engaged in dance instruction, and 3) to explore the perceptions and experiences of primary school learners, dance instructors, and parents regarding the impact of dance teaching on cognitive and physical development. Using an experimental design, 8 fourth-grade classrooms were divided into two groups by cluster random sampling: an experimental group receiving traditional dance instruction and a control group participating in conventional physical education. For four weeks, data were collected through questionnaires, tests, and demographic surveys. The results revealed significant improvements in cognitive and physical development among the experimental group compared to the control group. The findings revealed as follows: 1) for cognitive development, students who participated in dance classes achieved higher scores (M = 88.68, SD = 3.45) than those in the control group (M = 70.40, SD = 2.78), with a statistically significant t-test value of 29.16 (p < 0.001),2) Physical development outcomes also showed substantial improvement in sprint times, flexibility, jump rope counts, and sit-up counts among the experimental group (e.g., sprint time: M = 9.27s vs. M = 11.69s; flexibility: M = 12.68 cm vs. M = 8.57 cm), and 3 positive perceptions among students regarding their sense of rhythm (M = 4.02), smoothness of movements (M = 3.94), and teamwork performance (M = 3.80), emphasizing the social and emotional benefits of dance education. The findings align with prior research demonstrating that dance promotes cognitive functions such as attention and memory while enhancing physical skills like coordination and endurance. Demographic factors such as gender, age, parental education, and income further influenced these outcomes, with female students and those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds showing greater cognitive gains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207