The Food‐Related Moral Experiences of Children (Aged 6–12) With Swallowing Difficulties: A Participatory Hermeneutic Ethnography Study Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Food is a vital need for every individual, acting as sustenance and cultural expression. Adequate nutrition is a right for every child, influencing their self-perception and worldview. Children aged 6-12 with swallowing difficulties face unique food experiences influenced by relational and environmental factors. Understanding these experiences and factors that could shape these experiences is essential. Sameroff's transactional model highlights the dynamic interplay between children and their surroundings, especially families and caregivers, shaping children's food-related experiences. This study explores the food-related moral experiences of children with swallowing difficulties and how interactions with families/caregivers influence these experiences. METHODS: This study employs participatory hermeneutic ethnography to explore the meaningful aspects of children's lives, including local norms and institutional practices. The research will focus on children aged 6 to 12 with swallowing difficulties, involving 10 to 15 participants from homes and schools. The participatory approach emphasizes children and families' active involvement, concentrating on food-related moral experiences. The analysis, guided by a Childhood Ethics framework, will consider family influences and healthcare contexts. Multiple methods, such as participant observation and interviews, will be used simultaneously in data collection, with ongoing involvement of children and families in the research process. CONCLUSION: This study will enhance understanding of the food-related moral experiences of children with swallowing difficulties and inform targeted interventions to improve mealtime experiences. KEY MESSAGES: Food experiences in children with swallowing difficulties carry moral meaning (e.g., dignity, inclusion and autonomy). This study centres children's voices using participatory hermeneutic ethnography. Results will inform mealtime practices that support both nutrition and emotional well-being. Children and families should be active partners in care, research and policy. Findings can guide child-specific care strategies, training and policy changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".