MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411135028 · doi:10.5014/ajot.2025.051047

OT-Parentship Effectiveness on Parental Resilience, Self-Determination, and Occupational Performance of Parents and Their Autistic Adolescents: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4411135028 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Batel Wachspress, Adina Maeir, Shlomit Tsafrir, Tal Mazor‐Karsenty

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutismPsychologyRandomized controlled trialPsychological resiliencePsychological interventionClinical psychologyCompetence (human resources)Occupational therapyAutonomyIntervention (counseling)Developmental psychologyMedicinePsychiatryPsychotherapistSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMPORTANCE: Parents of autistic adolescents often experience unique caregiving responsibilities and significant stress, leading to challenges in navigating the complexities of their role and affecting their quality of life. Enhancing parental resilience is crucial for supporting autistic adolescents' needs and fostering positive family outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of the OT-Parentship intervention in enhancing parental resilience, self-determination, and occupational performance of parents and their autistic adolescents. DESIGN: A two-group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial with pretest-posttest and 3-mo follow-up assessments. SETTING: A research laboratory or virtually via computer at participants' home. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six parents (individuals or couples) of autistic adolescents ages 12 to 18 yr were recruited. INTERVENTION: The experimental group (n = 20) received the OT-Parentship intervention, and the control group (n = 16) received a psychoeducational video-based intervention. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study evaluated parental resilience (Autism: Parenting Questionnaire [APQ]), self-determination (Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction in Relationships [BPNSR]), and occupational performance (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [COPM]). Adolescents' occupational performance was identified by their parents (COPM). RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated greater gains in outcomes compared with the control group. Significant Group × Time interactions were found for the APQ, BPNSR competence, and parent and adolescent COPM. The experimental group also showed significant improvement in BPNSR autonomy and relatedness over time. These improvements were sustained at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: OT-Parentship effectively enhanced parental resilience, self-determination, and parent and adolescent occupational performance, highlighting the potential of parent-centered interventions to improve family outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Raising an adolescent with autism can bring distinct challenges for parents as they manage the specific demands and complexities that frequently arise in their daily lives. This study explored a new occupational therapy program, OT-Parentship, to help parents of autistic adolescents feel more capable and confident. OT-Parentship combines a structured approach based on integrated theoretical models to empower parents to address their needs and support their adolescent's functional independence through a collaborative process. We compared the OT-Parentship program with a program that used educational videos. Results showed that parents who participated in OT-Parentship experienced significant improvements in their parental resilience, sense of self-determination, and both their own occupational performance and that of their adolescent. These positive changes were seen both immediately after the program and three months later. Our findings highlight the importance of supporting parents of autistic adolescents and suggest that OT-Parentship may be a valuable tool for enhancing parenting abilities and supporting autistic adolescents in their everyday lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207