Artificial Intelligence for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a globally prevalent malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. Despite therapeutic advances, patient outcomes are hindered by tumor heterogeneity, treatment-related toxicity, and the limitations of traditional prognostic tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the opportunity to improve personalized HNSCC management by integrating complex radiologic, pathologic, and molecular data into actionable information insights. This review synthesizes recent developments in AI applications across the HNSCC care continuum, from diagnosis through treatment planning, emphasizing their clinical relevance and translational potential. AI has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy through automated tumor burden assessment, extranodal extension prediction, and endoscopic image analysis. Deep learning applied to radiology and digital pathology enables the extraction of prognostic features that may inform risk stratification and treatment de-escalation, particularly in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma. Multimodal AI models that fuse imaging, histopathology, and electronic health records have demonstrated superior performance in predicting survival outcomes compared with unimodal approaches. Additional applications include early toxicity detection during radiotherapy, adaptive treatment planning, and surgical complication forecasting. AI also holds potential in predicting immunotherapy response by identifying imaging and histologic correlates of tumor immunogenicity. Barriers to clinical translation remain, and continued development of explainable models, prospective trials, and seamless integration into clinical workflows will be critical for broad adoption. AI has already begun to affect HNSCC radiotherapy and surgical planning, and with thoughtful implementation, it may enable safer, more personalized care across the HNSCC treatment landscape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".