MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411150186 · doi:10.1103/prxlife.3.023012

Diurnal Variations in Digestion and Flow Drive Microbial Dynamics in the Gut

2025· article· en· W4411150186 on OpenAlexaff
Alinaghi Salari, Jonas Cremer

Bibliographic record

VenuePRX Life · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersStanford Bio-X
KeywordsDigestion (alchemy)Dynamics (music)Flow (mathematics)Environmental scienceBiological systemChemistryBiologyMechanicsPhysicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human large intestine harbors a highly dynamic microbial ecosystem in which growing microbes regularly replenish biomass lost via feces. Elucidating these population dynamics is important as studies increasingly indicate a direct link between microbial density imbalances in the large intestine and host immune responses, colonic cell physiology, as well as disease development. However, given the strong changes in microbial growth, biomass, and intestinal fluid flow throughout the day, gaining a better understanding of these population dynamics remains a major challenge. Leveraging experimental data on fluid turnover, nutrient supply, and microbial growth, we here derive a biophysical model of microbial population dynamics in the proximal large intestine. We show how the digestion of meals in batches triggers strong fluctuations in fluid movement and bacteria growth. Comparing different model scenarios, we further analyze how the expandable nature of the proximal large intestine, the presence of a pouch-like cecum off major flow paths, and the periodic exit of luminal content via “mass movements” are required in combination to maintain the high microbial population observed in the proximal large intestine. As the microbial population undergoes several bottlenecks followed by rapid growth each day, the effective population size in the proximal large intestine is small, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:msub> <a:mi>N</a:mi> <a:mi>e</a:mi> </a:msub> <a:mo>∼</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mn>10</a:mn> </a:mrow> <a:mn>7</a:mn> </a:msup> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mn>10</a:mn> </a:mrow> <a:mn>11</a:mn> </a:msup> </a:mrow> </a:math> , promoting the rapid evolution of microbes. The diurnal fluctuations in flow also hamper the accumulation of slower-growing bacteria and lead to substantial variations in the uptake of fermentation products by the host. Our findings underscore the complex interplay between population dynamics of the gut microbiota, fluid flow, and bacterial growth with important consequences for the microbiome and the host.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRX LifeSame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207