“My parent is acting different, should I be worried?” child temperament and caregiver emotional consistency in predicting child anxiety in the surgical setting.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
= 1.7, range = 8-13 years, 46.1% boys, 67.6% White) who underwent elective surgery and their caregivers (the majority of whom were their biological parents). Children's temperamental shyness and parents' trait anxiety were self-reported 7-10 days prior to surgery during a preoperative clinic visit (Time 1). During the day of surgery (Time 2), children's preoperative state anxiety and parents' state anxiety were self-reported in the hospital prior to surgery, and parents' state anxiety was directly observed in the operating room leading up to surgery. CEC was operationalized as separate difference scores between changes in parent trait anxiety at Time 1 to parent state anxiety during the day of surgery and observed state anxiety in the operating room at Time 2. We found that the CEC measure moderated the relation between children's temperamental shyness and preoperative anxiety during the day of surgery. Shy children were more anxious on the day of surgery when their parents had relatively low CEC than shy children with relatively high CEC parents, whereas low-shy children were relatively unaffected by parents' CEC levels. These findings provide evidence for a diathesis-stress model underlying the relation between individual differences in children's temperament and anxiety in a real-world, ecologically salient stressful context, extending prior work reported in traditional settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".