The Increasing Rate of Juvenile Delinquency: An Exploration of the Intervention Programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the effectiveness of intervention programs provided to juvenile delinquents and proposes improvements to better address their needs. Juvenile delinquency is a growing issue, with many minors engaging in criminal activities from a young age due to various socio-economic, familial, and environmental factors. The study identifies that low-income families, dysfunctional family structures, and the influence of peer pressure and drugs contribute significantly to delinquent behavior. The research also highlights the importance of effective rehabilitation programs in reducing recidivism and reintegrating juveniles as law-abiding citizens. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the study gathers insights through interviews and focus group discussions with social workers and staff at Tahanan ng Kabataan, a juvenile rehabilitation center in Cagayan de Oro. Findings reveal that while the institution provides a variety of general intervention programs, there is a lack of specialized programs tailored to individual needs, especially for juveniles involved in drug-related offenses. The study proposes implementing more individualized, specialized programs such as drug education, behavioral counseling, and family-based interventions. Additionally, it stresses the importance of competent staff trained to handle specific issues like drug abuse, emphasizing the need for a holistic, community-based approach to prevent juvenile delinquency and support the rehabilitation of young offenders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".