A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Particle Spatial, Velocity, and Temperature Distributions in Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masked cold spray additive manufacturing (CSAM) is investigated for fabricating nickel-based electrodes with pyramidal pin-fins that enlarge the active area for the hydrogen-evolution reaction (HER). To bypass the high cost of purely CFD-driven optimization, we construct a two-stage machine learning (ML) framework trained on 48 high-fidelity CFD simulations. Stage 1 applies sampling and a K-nearest-neighbor kernel-density-estimation algorithm that predicts the spatial distribution of impacting particles and re-allocates weights in regions of under-estimation. Stage 2 combines sampling, interpolation and symbolic regression to extract key features, then uses a weighted random forest model to forecast particle velocity and temperature upon impact. The ML predictions closely match CFD outputs while reducing computation time by orders of magnitude, demonstrating that ML-CFD integration can accelerate CSAM process design. Although developed for a masked setup, the framework generalizes readily to unmasked cold spray configurations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".