Transforming Marketing Strategies to a Sustainable Future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amid escalating global concerns over climate change and environmental degradation, green marketing strategies have emerged as pivotal for sustainable business practices. This paper delves into the drivers compelling enterprises to embrace green marketing, scrutinizing the influence of stakeholder expectations, evolving consumer preferences, and stringent environmental regulations. By conducting an in-depth case study of Tesla's foray into the Chinese market, the paper elucidates the pivotal role of green marketing in bolstering brand image, sustaining profitability, and fostering sustainable growth. Despite challenges like consumer scepticism and the prevalence of greenwashing, the research underscores that companies can effectively embrace green marketing with transparent environmental initiatives and innovative application of the marketing mix. Expanding the traditional 4P model to a 7P framework, this paper aligns the marketing mix more closely with green marketing objectives. The study offers actionable insights for managers looking to craft effective green marketing strategies and sets the stage for future research to explore the long-term financial implications and brand loyalty enhancement potential of green marketing initiatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".