MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411172122 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2025.3578283

Pediatric Corpulence Assessment Using Ultra-Wideband Radar Imaging System: A Novel Approach in Tissue Characterization

2025· article· en· W4411172122 on OpenAlexaff
Kapil Gangwar, Fatemeh Modares Sabzevari, Karumudi Rambabu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadar imagingRadarCharacterization (materials science)Optical imagingComputer scienceMedical imagingWidebandBiological tissueBiomedical engineeringComputer visionMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceOpticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an ex-vivo method to estimate the dielectric properties and thickness of adipose tissue in the human body. Based on the electrical properties of adipose tissue, obesity levels will be assessed. This approach consists of two steps: 1) data acquisition by an ultrawideband (UWB) time-domain radar and 2) genetic algorithm optimization of the intended goal function. This study considers a three-layered tissue model to mimic the surface of the human abdomen. The experimental phantom consists of a pork skin layer followed by pork fat, then ground pork to emulate the muscle tissue. An aperture with a diameter of 2 cm on a metal sheet focuses the measurements on a small area of interest. The measured results were compared with the actual permittivity and thickness of different layers of the experimental phantom. The technique is also applied to human voxel tissue models available in the CST software library, including babies, children, and adults. The accuracy of measurement data confirms the suitability of this technique. This technique is a noninvasive, safe, cost-effective method to determine the type of fat tissue in the human body and the level of obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207