MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411176538 · doi:10.1007/s44338-025-00085-8

Review of the trade in proboscis monkeys over the last 25 years

2025· article· en· W4411176538 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Nijman, Chris R. Shepherd

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Animals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsWildlife Conservation Society Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProboscisBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proboscis monkeys Nasalis larvatus are endemic to the island of Borneo (politically shared between Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam and Indonesia) and are threatened by habitat destruction, fires and hunting. Because of their specialised diet, they are very challenging to maintain in captivity and in the past live trade was not seen as an impediment to their conservation. We report on and review the trade in proboscis monkeys over the period 1999–2024, based on published literature, media reports, seizure records, court rulings and communication with experts. We found no records for Malaysian Borneo or Brunei. We found 25 reports in the Indonesian media (concerning 52 proboscis monkeys), mostly from after 2016, and mostly from the province of South Kalimantan (14 reports) but also from the islands of Sulawesi and Java, both gateways for export and neither within the natural range of the species. In 2024 one proboscis monkey was seized in Mumbai, India, coming from Indonesia. Proboscis monkey skulls were found in trade in wildlife shops in Bali in 2022–2025, specifically targeting foreign tourists. Online traders in Sumatra, Kalimantan and Java were found offering at least 48 proboscis monkeys for sale. Between 2016 and 2024, 14 people were prosecuted in Indonesia for trading, transporting or keeping a total of 42 proboscis monkeys, receiving a mean fine of USD1,795 (out of a possible maximum of USD6,150) and a mean sentence of 13 months in prison (out of a maximum of 5 years). Prior to the turn of the century there were very few proboscis monkeys in zoos, but in recent years this has changed, and now there are at least 74 individuals in 10 Indonesian zoos and 2 individuals in a Malaysian zoo, in addition to at least 31 individuals in zoos in Singapore, China and Japan. Our review shows that not only are zoos increasingly acquiring this species but that proboscis monkeys are also increasingly available in the illegal wildlife trade. We urge the authorities, especially in Indonesia, to increase the efforts to enforce existing legislation and to be more active in their efforts to curb the trade in these globally threatened primates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover AnimalsSame topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207