MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411179901 · doi:10.12659/ajcr.947900

Advanced Fractional CO₂ Laser Treatment for Steroid-Induced Atrophy Scars: Clinical Outcomes

2025· article· en· W4411179901 on OpenAlex
Klodiana Braho, Alessandra Zevini, Riccardo Barini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrophyScarsSteroidInternal medicineDermatologyPathologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Steroid-induced atrophy is a common complication of intralesional corticosteroid use, characterized by thinning of the dermis and epidermis, reduced fibroblast activity, and subcutaneous fat atrophy. Traditional treatment modalities, including topical therapies, dermal fillers, and fat grafting, often yield variable results and present limitations such as invasiveness, temporary effects, or complications. This case report presents a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of steroid-induced atrophic scars (SIAS) on the face, using fractional CO₂ laser therapy, recognized for its ability to promote dermal remodeling and scar improvement. CASE REPORT A 32-year-old woman presented with a single atrophic scar on her cheek, resulting from an intralesional corticosteroid injection. The patient underwent a preparatory phase involving mono polydioxanone (PDO) threads and dimethylaminoethanol (DMEA) skin booster to enhance dermal remodeling. She then received 2 sessions of fractional 10 600 nm laser therapy spaced 4 months apart, with tailored parameters: initial settings of 15 mJ/dot and 100 dots/cm², adjusted to 175 dots/cm² with Spread Half Fill Mode in the second session. This approach minimized downtime, with erythema resolving in 1-2 days, and avoided post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Clinical evaluations, including the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), showed significant improvement. The patient reported high satisfaction and improved quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Fractional CO₂ laser therapy represents a promising, minimally invasive treatment option for SIAS. The dual-session protocol highlighted in this report underscores its safety and efficacy. Future research should include larger trials, comparative studies, and parameter optimization for diverse populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it