The Community Health Workers and Mobile Health for Emerging Adults Transitioning Sickle Cell Disease Care (COMETS) Trial: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transitioning from pediatric to adult sickle cell disease (SCD) care is challenging for emerging adults (aged 17-25 years). This period is marked by a 7-fold increase in mortality rates and has the highest rates of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and hospital readmissions compared with children living with SCD. These challenges are exacerbated by fragmented care coordination, difficulty navigating adult health care systems, and increased self-management responsibilities. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 interventions designed to support emerging adults living with SCD during this transition: a mobile health (mHealth) app and community health worker (CHW) support to standard care. METHODS: The Community Health Workers and Mobile Health for Emerging Adults Transitioning Sickle Cell Disease Care (COMETS) trial is an ongoing multicenter, 3-arm, open-label randomized controlled trial; 375 emerging adults (aged 17-25 years) are being enrolled and randomized 1:1:1 to (1) a 6-month CHW intervention focused on self-management skills, symptom tracking, care coordination, and transition planning; (2) a 6-month mHealth self-management program (enhanced iManage application) with tailored SMS text messaging (THRIVE [Texting Health-Related Resources to Inform, Motivate, and Engage] 2.0); or (3) enhanced usual care (control). Participants are followed for 18 months. The primary outcome is the change in self-reported health-related quality of life assessed using the PedsQL SCD module. Secondary outcomes include acute care use (hospitalizations and emergency department visits), patient activation, self-management behavior, and successful transfer to adult hematology care. RESULTS: The institutional review board at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia approved this study in June 2018. Recruitment began in January 2019 and ended in December 2022; we completed data collection in November 2024. We have enrolled a total of 405 participants. CONCLUSIONS: This trial addresses a critical gap in transition intervention research for young adults with SCD. It will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of 2 promising interventions (CHW and mHealth) and inform the development of scalable and sustainable transition support programs. Findings will have implications for improving health-related quality of life, reducing acute care use, and promoting successful transition to adult-centered SCD care for this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03648710; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03648710. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/69239.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.031 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.092 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".