MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411184237 · doi:10.1002/adom.202500602

Pressure‐Induced Structural and Optoelectronic Modulations in 2D Dion‐Jacobson Hybrid Lead Iodide Perovskites With a Rigid Spacer

2025· article· en· W4411184237 on OpenAlexafffund
A. P. K. Kutty, Jesse Ratté, Rongfeng Guan, Jingyan Liu, Yuktsun Lin, Matthew P. Hautzinger, Willa Mihalyi‐Koch, Song Jin, Yang Song

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceIodideOptoelectronicsInorganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract 2D hybrid organic‐inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) are known for their superior chemical and thermal stability over 3D variants, positioning them as promising materials for advanced optoelectronic applications. Applying external high pressure is an effective strategy to modify their structures and tune their optoelectronic properties. This study examines the high‐pressure behavior of a Dion‐Jacobson type 2D HOIP, DPDAPbI4, which incorporates the rigid organic spacer N,N‐dimethylphenylene‐p‐diammonium (DPDA). Utilizing photoluminescence, UV–visible absorption, vibrational spectroscopy, and in situ synchrotron powder X‐ray diffraction, an isostructural phase transition is identified near 1.5 GPa, marked by a notable shift in photoluminescence intensity linked to free exciton emission. Synchrotron X‐ray diffraction reveals significant anisotropic compression along the c‐axis, while structural analysis indicates the rare phenomenon of reduced lead‐iodide octahedral distortion below 2 GPa, contrasting with the increased octahedral distortion reported in most previous studies on lead‐based 2D HOIPs. Density functional theory calculations elucidate the structural origins and mechanisms driving the pressure‐induced phase transition and optoelectronic tuning. These findings underscore the critical interplay between rigid organic spacers and inorganic octahedra in modulating high‐pressure optoelectronic properties, offering valuable insights for designing future 2D HOIPs with tailored functionalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207