MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411189729 · doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2025.107469

Simulation and measurements of HDR brachytherapy source dosimetric parameters using a fiber-optic dosimeter

2025· article· en· W4411189729 on OpenAlex
Khalid Alhamad, Dean Cutajar, Joel Poder, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Enbang Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Measurements · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de MontréalTaif UniversityUniversity of Hafr Al Batin
KeywordsDosimeterBrachytherapyDosimetryNuclear medicineOpticsMaterials scienceThermoluminescent dosimeterRadiochemistryMedical physicsPhysicsRadiation therapyChemistryMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using CsI(Tl)-based fibre-optic dosimetry system for TG-43 dosimetric characterization of the Flexisource 192 Ir HDR brachytherapy source. The investigation focuses on anisotropy and radial dose function measurements and assesses the impact of fluorescence and Cherenkov radiation on signal accuracy, with validation through TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations. Thallium Doped-Caesium Iodide (CsI(Tl)) scintillation crystals were used within a custom-designed PMMA phantom. The experiment, conducted with a Flexitron afterloader and 192 Ir Flexisource, involved measurements at distances of 1.5–6 cm and polar angles of 20°–155°, with increments matching those in the published studies. Comprehensive dosimetric data were collected, revealing the influence of fluorescence and Cherenkov radiation on anisotropy function measurements. The radial dose function showed good agreement with simulation, with minor deviations attributed to limitations in the treatment planning. TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated consistent agreement with experimental results, yielding a maximum absolute difference of 0.035 in the experimental data and a maximum deviation of 2.6% in anisotropy function validation against published reference data, further confirming the reliability of both the experimental approach and the simulation model. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for fluorescence and Cherenkov radiation in detector signal response. Unlike earlier approaches that primarily focused on signal removal or hardware suppression techniques, this study demonstrates the integration of these contributions directly into calibration models to improve dosimetric precision. By refining these calibration methods, fibre-optic detectors may be further developed into simple, accurate, and clinically viable tools for brachytherapy applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it