A Rare and Challenging Presentation of an Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumour: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumours (IMTs) are rare pulmonary neoplasms, accounting for less than 1% of lung tumours. Patients present with non-specific symptoms and diverse radiological findings. A 32-year-old female presented with progressively worsening cough, haemoptysis, low-grade fever and increasing shortness of breath. Chest X-ray revealed a total right lung collapse. Further imaging revealed a mass obstructing the right mainstem bronchus. A staged debulking procedure using rigid bronchoscopy was performed, followed by the insertion of a silicone stent to maintain airway patency. Endobronchial growth turned out to be an Inflammatory Myofibroblastic tumour. The patient showed significant improvement in respiratory function and lung re-expansion. Adjuvant therapy with ALK inhibitor was initiated. IMTs, while benign histologically, may recur or metastasise, requiring long-term monitoring. Bronchoscopic interventions offer effective treatment for localised disease, while surgery is preferred for extensive tumours. Early diagnosis, genetic profiling and a multidisciplinary approach are key for optimal outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".