MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411195935 · doi:10.1134/s0031030125600064

Use of Isotopic Analysis of Insect and Freshwater Crustacean Chitin from Quaternary Sediments for Reconstruction of Past Natural Environments

2025· article· en· W4411195935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. I. Izyumova, Svetlana Kuzmina, Dmitry S. Kopylov, Andrey V. Tchabovsky, Alexei V. Tiunov, Alexey A. Kotov

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleontological Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChitinQuaternaryCrustaceanInsectNatural (archaeology)GeologyEcologyBiologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An analysis of the isotopic composition of chitin (oxygen and nitrogen) was made for the first time for terrestrial and freshwater Pleistocene arthropods from the localities at the Old Crow River in northwestern Yukon, representing an interval from the middle Pleistocene to the Holocene. About a hundred fragments of arthropods were tested among the fossils, including the weevils Lepidophorus lineaticollis (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), some ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae), as well as the ephippia of freshwater crustacean Daphnia cf. pulex (Branchiopoda, Daphniidae). An isotope analysis of extant representatives of the same arthropods from different regions of the Yukon was made for comparison. Isotopic lines show differences between terrestrial and freshwater animals. The isotopic composition of freshwater crustaceans shows the difference between cold and warm time intervals. Herbivorous beetles show a more complex picture, possibly associated with the adaptation to different biotopes and host plants, which allowed the species to survive during climatic and environmental fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleontological JournalSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207