Revolutionizing healthcare data analytics with federated learning: A comprehensive survey of applications, systems, and future directions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning (FL)-a distributed machine learning that offers collaborative training of global models across multiple clients. FL has been considered for the design and development of many FL systems in various domains. Hence, we present a comprehensive survey and analysis of existing FL systems, drawing insights from more than 250 articles published in 2019-2024. Our review elucidates the functioning of FL systems, particularly in comparison with alternative distributed learning approaches. Considering the healthcare domain as an example, we define the building blocks of a typical FL healthcare system, including system architecture, federation scale, data partitioning, open-source frameworks, ML models, and aggregation algorithms. Furthermore, we identify and discuss key challenges associated with the design and implementation of FL systems within the healthcare sector while outlining the directions of future research. In general, through systematic categorization and analysis of existing FL systems, we offer insights to design efficient, accurate, and privacy-preserving healthcare applications using cutting-edge FL techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it