MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411196314 · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2025.104016

Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from diverse wildfowl exhibit distinct antifungal susceptibility profiles driven by genetic and non-genetic determinants

2025· article· en· W4411196314 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Oscar Bruña–Romero, Magalie Galarneau, Samanta Pladwig, Boyan Liu, Sherri Cox, Jennifer Geddes‐McAlister

Bibliographic record

VenueFungal Genetics and Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInstitute of Infection and ImmunityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBiologyAspergillus fumigatusAntifungalMicrobiologyGeneticsComputational biologyEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a fungal infection caused by Aspergillus species affecting humans and animals, including birds. Such infections have severe impacts on host health, with the efficacy of current treatment options dwindling against rising rates of antifungal resistance. This scenario represents a critical One Health challenge influenced by climate change at the intersection of animal, human, and environmental health. In this study, we isolated and identified four fungal isolates from infected wildfowl in Southern Ontario, Canada, as Aspergillus fumigatus. Antifungal susceptibility assays against amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole and terbinafine were performed following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines for filamentous fungi. All strains displayed similar sensitivity to amphotericin B and itraconazole, whereas differences were observed in the response to voriconazole and terbinafine. Next, we performed whole genome sequencing integrated with a comparative genomic analysis to define differences across isolates potentially influencing antifungal susceptibility. As expected, the isolates were phylogenetically similar but demonstrated distinct clustering with A. fumigatus isolate AfB6 mapping closely with the ATCC reference strain compared to the other isolates (i.e., AfB2, AfB8, and AfB7). Notably, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected across the strains with some correlation between SNPs in antifungal resistance-associated genes and susceptibility profiles; however, antifungal tolerance towards terbinafine was not directly correlated with genetic factors. These data suggest that A. fumigatus isolated from wildfowl with lethal infections from Southern Ontario, Canada, have varying levels of susceptibility to known antifungals and that drivers beyond the anticipated genetic factors influence antifungal response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFungal Genetics and BiologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207