MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411200409 · doi:10.1021/ehp.6c00247

Exposure to Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants and Plasticizers during Pregnancy and Autism-Related Outcomes in the ECHO Cohort

2025· article· en· W4411200409 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jennifer Ames, Assiamira Ferrara, Juanran Feng, Stacey Alexeeff, Lyndsay A. Avalos, Emily S. Barrett, Theresa M. Bastain, Deborah H. Bennett, Jessie P. Buckley, Courtney C. Carignan, Patricia Cintora, Akhgar Ghassabian, Monique M. Hedderson, Ixel Hernandez‐Castro, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Margaret R. Karagas, Catherine J. Karr, Jordan R. Kuiper, Donghai Liang, Kristen Lyall, Cindy T. McEvoy, Rachel Morello‐Frosch, Thomas G. O’Connor, Jiwon Oh, Alicia K. Peterson, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Susan Schantz, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Anne P. Starling, Tracey J. Woodruff, Heather E. Volk, Yeyi Zhu, Lisa Croen

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Perspectives · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNIH Office of the DirectorMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington UniversityUniversity of California, DavisCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignYork UniversityDartmouth CollegeNYU Grossman School of MedicineDrexel UniversityNew York State Department of HealthUniversity of WashingtonUniversity at AlbanyKaiser PermanenteUniversity of RochesterEmory UniversityMichigan State UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillGeorge Washington UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsPlasticizerOrganophosphatePregnancyCohortOccupational exposureMedicineCohort studyToxicologyObstetricsChemistryEnvironmental healthInternal medicineBiologyOrganic chemistryPesticideGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers (OPEs) have myriad uses in industry and consumer products. Increasing human exposure to OPEs has raised concerns about their potential effects on child neurodevelopment during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether OPE urinary concentrations during pregnancy were associated with child autism-related outcomes. METHODS: We included 4159 mother-child pairs from 15 cohorts in the NIH Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Consortium, with children born from 2006-2020 (median age [interquartile range]: 6 [4,10] years). Nine OPE biomarkers were measured in urine samples collected mid- to late pregnancy. Dilution-adjusted biomarkers were modeled continuously, categorically (high [> median], moderate [≤ median], non-detect), or as detect/non-detect depending on their detection frequency. We assessed child autism-related traits via a) parent report on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and b) clinical autism diagnosis. We examined associations of OPEs with child outcomes, including modification by child sex, using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering by ECHO cohort. RESULTS: Compared with non-detectable concentrations, high exposure to bis(butoxyethyl) phosphate (BBOEP) was associated with higher autistic trait scores (adj-β 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 1.52) and greater odds of autism diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [adj-OR]: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.50). Bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BCPP) showed associations with autistic trait scores (BCPP adj-β for high exposure vs. non-detect: 0.34, 95% CI: -0.46, 1.13; BCPP adj-β for moderate exposure vs. non-detect: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.24, 1.20). High exposure to bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (BCETP) was associated with lower odds of autism diagnosis (adj-OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.95). Other OPEs showed no associations in adjusted models. Associations between BBOEP and higher autistic trait scores were stronger in males than females. DISCUSSION: Prenatal exposure to OPEs, specifically BCPP and BBOEP, may be associated with higher risk of autism diagnosis and related traits in childhood. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16177.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health PerspectivesSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207