MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411200782 · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.014

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996)

2025· article· en· W4411200782 on OpenAlex
Martin Constant, Ananya Mandal, Dariusz Asanowicz, Bartłomiej Panek, Ilona Kotlewska, Motonori Yamaguchi, Helge Gillmeister, Dirk Kerzel, David Luque, Sara Molinero, Antonio Vázquez-Millán, Francesca Pesciarelli, Eleonora Borelli, Hanane Ramzaoui, Melissa R. Beck, Bertille Somon, Andrea Desantis, M. Concepción Castellanos, Elisa Martín‐Arévalo, Greta Manini, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Ahu Gökçe, Demet Özer, Efe Soyman, Joshua O. Eayrs, Raquel E. London, Tabitha Steendam, Christian Frings, Bernhard Pastötter, Bence Szaszkó, Pamela Baess, Shabnamalsadat Ayatollahi, Gustavo A. León Montoya, Nicole Wetzel, Andreas Widmann, Liyu Cao, Xueqi Low, Thiago Leiros Costa, Leonardo Chelazzi, Bianca Monachesi, Siri‐Maria Kamp, Luisa Knopf, Roxane J. Itier, Johannes Meixner, Kerstin Jost, André Botes, Carley Ann Braddock, Degao Li, Alicja Nowacka, Marlo Quenault, Daniele Scanzi, Tamar Torrance, Paul M. Corballis, Gianvito Laera, Matthias Kliegel, Dominik Welke, Faisal Mushtaq, Yuri G. Pavlov, Heinrich R. Liesefeld

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCortex · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersLeeds Biomedical Research CentreAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBrandenburger Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und KulturNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniwersytet Jagielloński w KrakowieSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDepartment of Health and Social CareMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNarodowym Centrum NaukiNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium MedicumUK Research and InnovationUniversity of EssexAgence Nationale de la RechercheJunta de AndalucíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPsychologyReplication (statistics)N2pcCognitive psychologyVisual attentionNeuroscienceCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The N2pc is widely employed as an electrophysiological marker of an attention allocation. This interpretation was largely driven by the observation of an N2pc elicited by an isolated relevant target object, which was reported as Experiment 2 in Eimer (1996). All subsequent refined interpretations of the N2pc had to take this crucial finding into account. Despite its central role for neurocognitive attention research, there have been no direct replications and only few conceptual replications of this seminal work. Within the context of #EEGManyLabs, an international community-driven effort to replicate the most influential EEG studies ever published, the present study was selected due to its strong impact on the study of selective attention. We revisit the idea of the N2pc being an indicator of attentional selectivity by delivering a high powered direct replication of Eimer's work through analysis of 779 datasets acquired from 22 labs across 14 countries. Our results robustly replicate the N2pc to form stimuli, but a direct replication of the N2pc to color stimuli technically failed. We believe that this pattern not only sheds further light on the functional significance of the N2pc as an electrophysiological marker of attentional selectivity, but also highlights a methodological problem with selecting analysis windows a priori. By contrast, the consistency of observed ERP patterns across labs and analysis pipelines is stunning, and this consistency is preserved even in datasets that were rejected for (ocular) artifacts, attesting to the robustness of the ERP technique and the feasibility of large-scale multilab EEG (replication) studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
gptMetaresearch
Domain: Reproducibility · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Other designhigh
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it