MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411201228 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v51i05a03

Enhanced screening for tuberculosis infection among immigrants in southern New Brunswick: A cross-sectional pilot study

2025· article· en· W4411201228 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Isdore Chola Shamputa, Hope Mackenzie, Derek Gaudet, Kim Barker, Duncan Webster

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversitySaint John Regional HospitalGovernment of New BrunswickUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuberculosisImmigrationCross-sectional studyMedicineEnvironmental healthGeographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In 2021, approximately 77% of active tuberculosis (TB) disease (TBD) cases in Canada were among foreign-born individuals. Less than 3% of TBD cases in Canada are detected through pre-arrival Canadian immigration medical examinations (i.e., chest X-rays), and the remaining 97% are likely due to reactivation of undiagnosed latent TB infection (TBI) post-arrival. In New Brunswick, the proportion of TBD cases among foreign-born individuals gradually increased from about 33% (1/3 individuals) in 2013 to 100% (14/14 individuals) in 2023. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of TBI among immigrants in southern New Brunswick, identify potential predictors for positive TBI screening and assess participant experiences with the pilot TBI screening procedure. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to November 2023 among immigrants ≥19 years old who had no history of TBD and were born in a country with a TB incidence rate of ≥40/100,000 population or were referred by healthcare professionals. Participants were recruited through various channels and underwent TBI screening using the interferon-gamma release assay, followed by a survey on their screening experience. Results: Of the 264 participants, 49 (18.6%) screened positive for TBI. Factors associated with higher odds of screening TBI-positive included birthplace in a "highly to severely endemic" (≥300/100,000 population) TB-incidence country (OR=3.24; 95% CI: 1.07-9.81) and increased age (OR=1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08). Participants rated the pilot TBI screening procedure positively (mean scores ranged from 4.03-4.55 on a five-point Likert scale). Conclusion: Results suggest that immigrants born in countries with TB incidences of ≥300/100,000 population should be considered for screening and treatment of TBI. The pilot TBI screening procedure yielded positive feedback. Further research with a larger sample is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207