Representative scale-invariant characteristics of male and female brains in magnetic resonance images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the link between sex and the human brain from anatomical MRI data, where a primary confound is the size difference between male and female groups. Anatomy is characterized by the 3D scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), where features are salient image regions that are automatically identified and normalized according local size or scale. Experiments use T1-w MRI data of 422 healthy unrelated subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset (211 males, 211 females, 22-36 years of age). We found that brain sex may be predicted via image-to-image feature matching with 91.9% accuracy, that classification is driven largely by weakly-informative features distributed throughout the brain and shared by unique subsets of subjects, and that a pair of features identified in the right and left thalamic regions of 97% of subjects predicts sex with 74% accuracy. Misclassified subjects exhibit features typical of the opposite sex in one or both hemispheres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it