MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411207882 · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003593

Birth Outcomes in Women Who Have Taken Vedolizumab in Pregnancy: Results From the Vedolizumab Pregnancy Exposure Registry

2025· article· en· W4411207882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christina Chambers, Diana L. Johnson, Yunjun Luo, Ronghui Xu, Margaret P Adam, Stephen R. Braddock, Kenneth Lyons Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicinePregnancyObstetricsInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: There are limited data on the safety of vedolizumab in pregnancy for the treatment of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Between 2015 and 2022, the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists conducted a prospective, observational pregnancy registry study with 275 pregnant women residing in the United States or Canada. METHODS: Women were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: vedolizumab-exposed (N = 99); disease-matched unexposed to vedolizumab, but treated with another biologic in pregnancy (N = 76); or unexposed with no chronic health conditions (N = 100). Women and their infants were followed up to 1 year postpartum with maternal interviews, questionnaires, medical records abstraction, and a subset of infants who received a physical examination. Study outcomes were major structural birth defects, minor birth defects, pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, prenatal and postnatal growth deficiency, serious or opportunistic infections, malignancies, and developmental milestones. RESULTS: In the overall registry, 17 of 275 pregnancies (6.2%) were lost to follow-up. Among pregnancies ending in at least 1 live born infant, 7 of 94 (7.4%) in the vedolizumab-exposed cohort compared with 4 of 71 (5.6%) in the disease-matched cohort had a major birth defect (adjusted risk ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33, 3.52). Compared with the disease-matched cohort, women in the vedolizumab-exposed group were not statistically significantly more likely to experience spontaneous abortion (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.17, 5.89). Women in the vedolizumab-exposed group were slightly but not significantly more likely to deliver preterm (adjusted hazard ratio 1.58, 95% CI 0.65, 3.82). CONCLUSIONS: No significant increased risks were noted with vedolizumab exposure for any of the other study outcomes. These data add reassuring evidence in support of the safety of vedolizumab in pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207