MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411208482 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539369

Gender differences in cognitive benefits of meeting physical activity guidelines in older Chinese adults

2025· article· en· W4411208482 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Wang, Peiyou Chen, Aiwu Jiang, Fan Zhang, Zhijian Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Social Science Fund of ChinaQinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of ChinaGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsGerontologyPhysical activityCognitionMedicinePsychologyPhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective This study investigates the relationship between adherence to WHO physical activity guidelines and cognitive function in older Chinese adults, with a particular focus on gender-specific effects. We hypothesize that meeting physical activity guidelines is positively associated with cognitive function and that the magnitude of this association differs between men and women. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 308 community-dwelling older adults in Nanjing, China (mean age = 68.4 years, SD = 5.6). Participants were stratified by gender and age group (60–70 vs. 71–80 years). Physical activity was objectively measured using ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, and cognitive function was assessed via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine associations between physical activity adherence and cognitive function, adjusting for age, education, BMI, and self-rated health. Gender differences were analyzed using ANOVA, and interaction terms were included to assess moderation effects. Results Older adults meeting the WHO-recommended 150 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week had significantly higher MoCA scores than non-adherent individuals ( β = 3.67, 95% CI: 3.04–4.29, p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.85). Women showed greater improvements in executive function ( β = 0.79, p = 0.043) and visuospatial abilities ( β = 0.47, p = 0.017), while men demonstrated greater memory gains ( β = 1.31, p < 0.001). A significant interaction between gender and physical activity adherence ( p = 0.008) suggested distinct cognitive benefits across sexes. Conclusion Adherence to physical activity guidelines is associated with cognitive health in older adults, with gender-specific variations in cognitive benefits. These findings underscore the importance of tailored public health interventions that consider gender differences in cognitive aging to optimize cognitive outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207