The Behaviours in Dementia Toolkit: A Descriptive Study on the Reach and Early Impact of a Digital Health Resource Library About Dementia-Related Mood and Behaviour Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Dementia is a syndrome with a high global prevalence that includes a number of progressive diseases of the brain affecting various cognitive domains such as memory and thinking and the performance of daily activities. It manifests as symptoms which often include significant mood and behaviour changes that are highly varied. Changed moods and behaviours due to dementia may reflect distress and may be stressful for both the person living with dementia and their informal and formal carers. To provide dementia care support specific to mood and behaviour changes, the Behaviours in Dementia Toolkit website (BiDT) was developed using human-centred design principles. The BiDT houses a user-friendly, digital library of over 300 free, practical, and evidence-informed resources to help all care partners better understand and compassionately respond to behaviours in dementia so they can support people with dementia to live well. Objective: (1) To characterize the users that visited the BiDT; and (2) to understand the platform’s early impact on these users. Methods: A multi-method, descriptive study was conducted in the early post-website launch period. Outcomes and measures examined included the following: (1) reach: unique visitors, region, unique visits, return visits, bounce rate; (2) engagement: engaged users, engaged sessions, session duration, pages viewed, engagement rate per webpage, search terms, resources accessed; (3) knowledge change; (4) behaviour change; and (5) website impact: relevance, feasibility, intention to use, improving access and use of dementia guidance, recommend to others. Data was collected using Google Analytics and an electronic survey of website users. Results: From 4 February to 31 March 2024, there were 76,890 unique visitors to the BiDT from 109 countries. Of 76,890 unique visitors to the BiDT during this period, 16,626 were engaged users as defined by Google Analytics (22%) from 80 countries. The highest number of unique engaged users were from Canada (n = 8124) with an engagement rate of 38%. From 5 March 2024 to 31 March 2024, 100 electronic surveys were completed by website users and included in the analysis. Website users indicated that the BiDT validated or increased their dementia care knowledge, beliefs, and activities (82%) and they reported that the website validated their current care approaches or increased their ability to provide care (78%). Further, 77% of respondents indicated that they intend to continue using the BiDT and 81.6% said that they would recommend it to others to review and adopt. Conclusions: The BiDT is a promising tool for sharing practical and evidence-informed information resources to support people experiencing dementia-related mood and behaviour changes. Early evaluation of the website has demonstrated significant reach and engagement with users in Canada and internationally. Survey data also demonstrated high ratings of website relevance, feasibility, intention to use, knowledge change, practice support, and its contribution to dementia guidance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".