Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow in River Bends and Confluences Using the k-ω SST Turbulence Model and Comparison with Standard and Realizable k-ε Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
River bends and confluences are critical features in fluvial environments where complex flow patterns, including secondary currents, turbulence, and surface changes, strongly influence sediment transport, river morphology, and water quality. The accurate prediction of these flow characteristics is essential for hydraulic engineering applications. In this study, we present a numerical simulation of turbulent flow in river bends and confluences, with special consideration given to the dynamic interaction between free-surface variations and closed-surface constraints. The simulations were performed using OpenFOAM, an open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFDs) platform, with the k-ω SST (Shear Stress Transport) turbulence model, which is well-suited for capturing boundary layer behavior and complex turbulence structures. The finite volume method (FVM) is used to simulate and examine the behavior of the secondary current in channel bends and confluences. Two sets of experimental data, one with a sharply curved channel and the other with a confluent channel, were used to compare the numerical results and to evaluate the validity of the model. This study focuses on investigating to what extent the k-ω SST turbulence model can capture the effects of secondary flow and surface changes on flow hydrodynamics, analyzing velocity profiles and turbulence effects. The results are validated against experimental data, demonstrating the model’s ability to reasonably replicate flow features under both free- and closed-surface conditions. This study provides insights into the performance of the k-ω SST model in simulating the impact of geometrical constraints on flow regimes, offering a computationally robust and reasonable tool for river engineering and water resources management, particularly in the context of hydraulic structure design and erosion control in curved and confluence regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it