MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

05-1: NO BLOOD? NO PROBLEM: BLOOD-FREE PERFUSION HUMAN AND PORCINE PANCREASES – A FEASIBILITY STUDY

2025· article· en· W4411227062 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Parmentier, Justin Manuel, Hongtao Gu, Herbert Y. Gaisano, Fei Kang, Kun Wang, Francisco Calderón-Novoa, Kenji Nakamura, Sujani Ganesh, Christian Hobeika, Sangeetha Kalimuthu, Samrat Ray, Qing Qu, Emma Mizdrak, Markus Selzner, Trevor Reichman

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerfusionMedicineCardiologyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: High discard rates of donor pancreases limit their use in transplantation and islet isolation. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) offers a platform to assess and enhance pancreatic viability. Traditionally, NMP relies on blood-based perfusates or oxygen carriers, posing logistical challenges. This study evaluates the feasibility of blood-free NMP in both human and porcine pancreas models. Methods: Five discarded human pancreases were perfused for 6-hours with blood- and oxygen-carrier-free perfusate and compared to six historical controls perfused with blood for 4-hours. All grafts were used for tissue slicing and calcium imaging, with three halves used for islet isolation. Four porcine grafts with minimal warm ischemia and 2-hours of cold ischemia were perfused for 3-hours using a blood-free perfusate, while four were perfused with a blood-based perfusate. Grafts were transplanted, and recipients were monitored until POD3. One blood-free case was excluded due to graft thrombosis, and one blood-based case due to technical issues. Results: In the human model, the blood-free group showed lower mean amylase levels (p=0.04) and higher mean C-peptide levels (p=0.03). Histology revealed no differences between baseline and 6-hours, confirming preserved pancreatic integrity. Islet isolation was successful in two blood-free cases, with glucose-stimulated insulin secretion comparable to blood-based controls. Calcium imaging further demonstrated an oscillatory response, indicating functional islets. In the porcine model, all recipients survived until POD3. Postoperative enzymatic activity was higher in blood-free recipients, though variability was observed. One recipient had markedly elevated enzyme levels while remaining asymptomatic. The glucose tolerance test showed comparable regulation between groups (p=0.49). Histology at POD3 showed mild to moderate necrosis and edema in both groups, with regenerative changes suggesting healing. Conclusions: These findings support blood-free NMP as a feasible alternative to blood-based methods. By preserving pancreatic viability and demonstrating comparable transplantation and islet outcomes, blood-free perfusion addresses logistical challenges and warrants further investigation with larger cohorts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207