MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411228191 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2025.05.018

Prescription Drug Coverage of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for People Living with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Canada

2025· article· en· W4411228191 on OpenAlexaffabout
Simone Cowan, Lynette Kosar, Stephanie Poon, Marc Bains, Jeannine Costigan, Anique Ducharme, Mena Gewarges, Sharon Groulx, Kendra MacFarlane, Seema Nagpal, Alexander Singer, Robert S. McKelvie

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareUniversity of ManitobaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British ColumbiaMontreal Heart InstituteOkanagan CollegeUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreOkanagan University CollegeSunnybrook Health Science CentreWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoCanadian Cardiovascular SocietySt. Paul's HospitalSaskatchewan HealthSaskatchewan Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEjection fractionGuidelineMedical prescriptionHeart failureMedicineDrugFraction (chemistry)PharmacotherapyIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicinePharmacologyPathologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) is cost-effective and is associated with significant reductions in morbidity and mortality. Yet, GDMT remains under-prescribed. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society's HF Working Group assessed formulary access to GDMT across Canada to identify differences in reimbursement and review how coverage aligns with evidence-based guidelines. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted for the period from June 2022 to July 2024 on the formulary coverage of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sinus node inhibitors in 10 Canadian provinces, 2 territories, and 6 federal programs. Results: In all provincial and territorial plans, patient eligibility and prior medication use criteria are required for sacubitril-valsartan reimbursement. Sacubitril-valsartan has coverage restrictions based on natriuretic peptides and prescriber qualifications, except in Ontario and Quebec. Carvedilol coverage is not a benefit in Ontario or British Columbia. Bisoprolol and spironolactone have universal coverage. Eplerenone is not listed in British Columbia. Dapagliflozin coverage is a benefit in all plans except Quebec. Ivabradine coverage has patient eligibility and prior medication use criteria in all provinces and territories and prescriber restrictions in certain regions. Two federal plans have universal coverage of GDMT. Conclusions: Differences in criteria for drug reimbursement create provincial and territorial variation in access to GDMT in Canada. Coverage criteria include prior medication use and prescriber qualifications, which are not supported by evidence-based guidelines. Systemwide changes in the funding of drug reimbursement programs are needed to improve access to GDMT for the more than 750,000 people living with HF in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207