Maintaining Resilience and Well-Being in the Era of Climate Change: Protocol of an Acceptability and Feasibility Pilot of the Bee Well Program for Treating Eco-Anxiety in Rural Children Exposed to Natural Hazards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effects of climate change on mental health are becoming widely recognized. Mental health can be impacted through direct and indirect exposure to natural hazards, as well as through the overarching awareness of climate change and the resultant environmental decline-the latter is termed eco-anxiety. Exposure to natural hazards also increases eco-anxiety, further compounding mental health impacts. Young people are especially vulnerable to the mental health impacts of climate change and have higher rates of eco-anxiety than other age groups. Those in rural areas are also more likely to be impacted by natural hazards, further underscoring the need to support this population. To date, there remains scant evidence regarding how to support young people with eco-anxiety, and few interventions, especially for children, have been evaluated. There is a need for further research to inform treatment for young people for climate change-related distress. OBJECTIVE: This study pilots a novel group-based mental health and resilience intervention in relation to eco-anxiety. Specifically, this project aims to explore the acceptability, feasibility, and clinical utility of a group-based eco-anxiety intervention. METHODS: The project is an exploratory pilot assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and clinical utility of a group-based intervention using a pre-post design with a single group. A minimum sample of 12 children aged 10-14 years located in a rural area and with exposure to at least one natural hazard will be enrolled in this study. In order to assess clinical utility, changes from preintervention to postintervention in distress, resilience, and climate emotions will be assessed. To do so, children will complete measures of psychological distress (subjective units of distress, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21-youth version), climate emotions, and resilience (Resilience Scale for Children-10) before and after the intervention. Acceptability will be assessed post intervention through a series of Likert scale and open-ended questions. Feasibility will be assessed through enrollment and the proportion of participants completing the full intervention. Eligible children will take part in a novel 5-module group-based intervention designed to build resilience, promote nature connectedness, build social support, and foster meaning-focused coping. RESULTS: This study has received ethics board approval by the University of New England's Human Research Ethics Committee (HE23-080). This study will be conducted from late 2024 to 2025. As of March 2025, 28 children have been enrolled in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Rural children and young people are an especially vulnerable population for the mental health impacts of climate change. To date, the evidence base for interventions for treating eco-anxiety remains sparse, especially for young people and children who typically have higher rates of eco-anxiety than older age groups. This study will provide preliminary evidence of a group-based treatment for children and adolescents experiencing eco-anxiety that can inform practitioners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12624001287527; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=388545. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/69005.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".