Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery Coupling and Major Morbidity and Operative Mortality After Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling ratio provides an assessment of RV function indexed to PA afterload. A low preoperative RV-PA ratio has been associated with increased mortality after transcatheter procedures. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, we hypothesized that a lower preoperative RV-PA ratio is independently associated with a higher risk of major morbidity and operative mortality (MMOM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery (aortic, mitral, and tricuspid). The RV-PA ratio was calculated using the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to PA systolic pressure (PASP). The primary outcome was MMOM as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). The Youden index was used to determine the optimal cutoff to classify into low versus high TAPSE/PASP ratio groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to test the association of TAPSE/PASP ratio with MMOM and other clinical outcomes with P- value <0.05 used for statistical significance. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four (14.3%) of the 868 patients who met inclusion criteria had the primary outcome of MMOM. Patients in the low TAPSE/PASP group were more likely to have MMOM (90 (22.0%) vs 34 (7.4%); P < .001) as well as longer intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), hospital LOS (H-LOS), and mechanical ventilation time (MVT). By multivariable analysis, TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.52 mm/mm Hg was associated with a significant increase in the risk of MMOM (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.83, P = .018). In the analyses of secondary outcomes, for every 0.1 mm/mm Hg increase in TAPSE/PASP ratio, there was a 4% reduction in ICU-LOS and MVT, and a 3% reduction in H-LOS. CONCLUSIONS: TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.52 mm/mm Hg was associated with a significant increase in the risk of MMOM. Low preoperative TAPSE/PASP ratio was also associated with longer ICU-LOS, H-LOS, and MVT, even when adjusting for STS risk score for MMOM and cardiopulmonary bypass time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".