MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411236843 · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104566

Analyzing the influence of transit pass ownership on the determinants of ride-sourcing frequency in Metro Vancouver: Implications for policy and urban mobility planning

2025· article· en· W4411236843 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sk. Md. Mashrur, Patrick Loa, Felita Ong, Khandker Nurul Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringUrban transitTransit (satellite)BusinessPublic transportCar ownershipTransportation planningUrban planningTransit-oriented developmentRail transitEconomic geographyRegional scienceEnvironmental planningEngineeringGeographyCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amid the growing popularity and prevalence of ride-sourcing, there has been interest in examining the determinants of ride-sourcing frequency. Studies on the topic have noted the influence of socio-demographic attributes on ride-sourcing frequency. Additionally, limited studies have investigated the impact of public transit use and transit pass ownership on ride-sourcing frequency. However, studies of this nature treat transit pass ownership and transit use as explanatory variables. Consequently, additional work is needed to develop a more nuanced understanding of the determinants of ride-sourcing frequency. This study estimates an exogenous switching hurdle model to examine whether the determinants of ride-sourcing frequency (and their impacts) differ based on transit pass ownership among residents of Metro Vancouver. Using data from a web-based survey, ride-sourcing frequency was jointly modelled along with transit pass ownership and ride-sourcing adoption. The results highlight the potential for the determinants of ride-sourcing frequency to differ between segments of ride-sourcing users based on transit pass ownership. Overall, the results underscore the potential for the determinants of ride-sourcing use (and their impacts) to vary among different segments of ride-sourcing users. The information presented in this study can help inform efforts to mitigate the negative externalities associated with ride-sourcing by highlighting the potential value of a targeted approach to policy development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207