MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411241788 · doi:10.18192/osurj.v4i1.7421

Investigating E. coli Strain HT115-mediated RNA Interference in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Nematode Infection by Ascaris lumbricoides

2025· article· en· W4411241788 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Tabassum Howlader, Adam Al-Khalili

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Science Undergraduate Research Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscaris lumbricoidesStrain (injury)NematodeMicrobiologyBiologyAscariasisRNA interferenceVirologyRNAImmunologyHelminthsGeneGeneticsEcologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nematodes are parasitic worms in the body that can lead to a variety of health problems. One subset of these nematodes are called Ascaris lumbricoides, which proliferate within the intestine. This is the most common worm affecting humans, infecting over hundreds of millions globally. A common method of nematode infection is through contact with soil contaminated with their eggs. This experiment attempts to disrupt the VENOM gene of A. lumbricoides to prevent their function in human hosts and lead to expulsion of the worm. This experiment begins with editing a gut bacterium to deliver RNA interference molecules to target the VENOM gene and lead to parasite expulsion. We propose two delivery methods of secretion: the first is to use the outer membrane vesicles to package and deliver the RNA and the second is to directly secrete the RNAi using a bacterial Type 3 secretion system. We propose that in both methods after the release of the RNAi, it will be absorbed by the worm and downregulate the VENOM gene leading to the worm's death. These findings will be able to provide valuable insight into improving current therapies and potentially give insight on how we can prevent recurrence of nematode infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Science Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207