Role of Redox-Induced Protein Modifications in Spermatozoa in Health and Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Male infertility contributes to approximately half of all infertility cases, with most cases associated with oxidative stress. Spermatozoa depend on finely tuned redox signaling for critical processes such as capacitation, motility, and fertilization competence; however, their unique structural and metabolic features render them particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage. Reversible oxidative modifications regulate enzymatic activity, signaling cascades, and structural stability, supporting normal sperm function, whereas irreversible oxidative damage impairs motility, acrosome reaction, and DNA integrity, contributing to male infertility. The intricate balance between physiological redox signaling and pathological oxidative stress demonstrates the potential of redox modifications as biomarkers for infertility diagnosis and as targets for antioxidant-based therapeutic interventions. This review explores the role of redox-induced protein modifications in sperm function, focusing on thiol oxidation, S-nitrosylation, sulfhydration, glutathionylation, CoAlation, and protein carbonylation. By uncovering the mechanisms of these redox modifications, we provide a framework for their modulation in the development of targeted redox interventions to improve male fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".